Optimal pacing for right ventricular and biventricular. Methods and results the biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block block hf trial randomized patients with atrioventricular block, new york heart association symptom classes i to iii hf, and lv ejection fraction. Biventricular pacing in heart failure hf improves survival, relieves symptoms, and attenuates left ventricular lv remodeling. Published in 20, the biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block blockhf trial compared biventricular pacing vs. Left ventricular and biventricular pacing in congestive. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart. Rv pacing in patients requiring a pacemakericd for highgrade av block and lvef. Biventricular pacemakers cardiac resynchronization. Left ventricular and biventricular pacing in congestive heart. Of the various nonpharmacological approaches, biventricular pacing or crt has gained interest since its introduction in the early 1990s. Background in patients with lv dysfunction and atrioventricular block, conventional rv pacing may yield. We evaluated whether biventricular pacing might reduce mortality, morbidity, and adverse left ventricular remodeling in such patients.
Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing. Two main mechanisms, systolic and diastolic, are known to be involved in reducing lv gradient with dddright ventricular apex rva pacing. Crt is the term applied to reestablishing synchronous contraction between the left ventricular free wall and the ventricular septum in an attempt to improve left ventricular efficiency and. Dimarco does research for medtronic, is a consultant for medtronic, novartis, and st.
Apr 22, 2020 in patients with highgrade atrioventricular block avb, a standard dualchamber pacemaker can restore av synchrony and ensure an adequate ventricular pacing rate. Patients receiving biventricular pacing had a lower incidence of the primary outcome of an urgent care visit for heart failure, death from any cause, or progression of heart failure, as measured by a significant increase in the lv endsystolic volume index. Dimarco, md, phd, professor of medicine, division of cardiology, university of virginia, charlottesville. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients. Curtis ab, worley sj, adamson pb, chung es, niazi i, sherfesee l, shinn t, sutton ms. It is known that right ventricular apical pacing can result in deterioration of left ventricular systolic function in the long run due to dyssynchrony of left ventricular contraction. Accordingly, we conducted the biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure. Biventricular pacingcardiac resynchronization therapy crt. Echocardiography guided determination of reliable atrial.
The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure study group. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic. Pdf characteristics of a large sample of candidates for. This study tested the hypothesis that biv pacing could reduce the degree of mitral regurgitation mr in patients with functional mr and. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block n engl j med 368. Sustained right ventricular rv apical pacing may lead to deterioration in ventricular function and an increased risk of heart failure, especially in.
The patients and the health care providers responsible for the management. Hisbundle pacing in a patient with dextrocardia, severe systolic dysfunction, and complete atrioventricular block manuel molinalerma, md, juan jimenezjaimez, md, phd, rosa maciasruiz, md. Left ventricular reverse remodeling with biventricular versus. The guidant congestive heart failure research group. For patients with atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction, biventricular pacing not only reduces the risk of mortalitymorbidity, but also leads to better clinical outcomes, including improved qol and heart failure status, compared with rv pacing. Right ventricular versus biventricular pacing for heart. Atrioventricular nodal ablation in atrial fibrillation. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacinginduced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function erich l. We, therefore, designed the biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block to prevent cardiac desynchronization biopace trial to study prospectively the longterm effects of biventricular vs. Findings from the block hf clinical trial, presented as latebreaking data at heart rhythm 20, the heart rhythm societys 34th annual scientific sessions, showed a marked reduction in heart failurerelated symptoms for patients with atrioventricular av block and left ventricular lv systolic dysfunction at six, 12, 18 and 24 months treated. Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with nyha class i, ii, or.
Biventricular pacing for patients with complete heart block. If the contractions lack synchrony because of either poor atrioventricular synchrony or lack of. Aug 23, 2016 st john sutton m, plappert t, adamson pb, et al. The block hf biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block trial demonstrated that biventricular paced patients had a reduced.
Randomised trials in sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block have shown that despite the maintenance of atrioventricular synchrony with dual chamber pacing mode ddd, ddd pacing does not reduce mortality as compared to single right ventricular pacing vvi, and has a modest or even negligible effect on the progression of heart failure. In the biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block block hf study by curtis et al. Biventricular pacing reduces symptoms in av block patients. Pdf biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and. Backgroundbiventricular pacing in heart failure hf improves survival, relieves symptoms, and. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure. Optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular. Biventricular pacemakers cardiac resynchronization therapy. Kiehl, md, tarek makki, md, rahul kumar, md, divya gumber, md, deborah h. Left ventricular reverse remodeling with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and heart failure in the block hf. Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with nyha class i, ii, or iii heart failure. Compared to rv pacing, biventricular biv pacing has been shown to preserve systolic function in patients with complete av block and an lvef.
Furthermore, she had intermittent loss 21 of av conduction at baseline and thus became pacemaker dependent. Optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delay. Biventricular pacing preserves left ventricular performance. This study adds to the existing body of evidence suggesting. Dec 20, 2005 curtis ab, worley sj, adamson pb, chung es, niazi i, sherfesee l, shinn t, sutton ms. This improvement in clinical composite score was sustained through 24 months. During the past two decades, biventricular pacing with a left ventricular lv pacing lead, or cardiac resynchronization therapy crt, has emerged as an alternative therapy with proven benefit in patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction and preexisting intraventricular conduction delay. Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with nyha class i, ii, or iii heart. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. Optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular delay with acoustic cardiography in biventricular pacing. Cardiac resynchronization therapy vs rv pacing in av block. Transvenous biventricular pacing for heart failure. Improvement in clinical outcomes with biventricular versus. Improvement in clinical outcomes withbiventricular versus.
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction for. Change in indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Right ventricular rv pacing is known to produce electric and mechanical dyssynchrony by triggering the right ventricle to contract before the left ventricle interventricular dyssynchrony and the septum to contract before the lateral walls intraventricular dyssynchrony. More recently, lv pacing and biventricular multisite pacing have been used to improve systolic contractility by altering the electrical and mechanical ventricular activation sequence in patients with severe congestive heart failure chf and intraventricular conduction delay or left bundle branch block. Biventricular biv pacing is a wellestablished heartfailure therapy for patients with impaired left ventricular lv systolic function and ventricular dyssynchrony, as indicated by a prolonged qrs duration. Background right ventricular pacing restores an adequate heart rate in patients with atrioventricular block, but high percentages of right ventricular apical pacing may promote left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction article pdf available in new england journal of medicine 3696.
April 25 issue, 1 the outcomes with right ventricular and biventricular pacing were compared in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular dysfunction. Jul 15, 20 biventricular pacing for bradycardia posted on july 15, 20 by alistair lindsay right ventricular rv pacing is used in patients presenting with high degree atrioventricular block, both to relieve symptoms related to bradycardia and improve prognosis. Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular av block typically receive a single or dual chamber pacemaker that delivers right ventricular rv. However, little is known about biventricular pacing in hf patients with atrioventricular block because they are typically excluded from biventricular trials. Biventricular vs rv pacing for av block in heart failure. Assessment of upgrading to biventricular pacing in.
Choice of ventricular pacing site radcliffe cardiology. Biventricular pacemakers, with or without an accompanying implantable cardiac defibrillator i. Biventricular pacing superior to rv pacing for av block with systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular reverse remodeling with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and heart failure in the block hf trial. The agency for healthcare research and quality ahrq published a technology assessment in 2004 to examine the success rate and safety of biventricular pacemaker implantation and the efficacy of crt in patients with heart failure. In the biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block block hf trial, biventricular was preferable to rv pacing in the presence of lv ejection fraction av block, but the potential for increased lv leadrelated complications should be considered. Chronic right ventricular pacing in the heart failure population. Reduction of mitral regurgitation by biventricular pacing.
Biventricular pacing superior to rv pacing for av block. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrioventricular block block hf showed beneficial outcomes for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left ventricular and biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure. Analysis of realworld insurance claims data showed that among dualchamber pacemaker patients without prior heart failure hf, complete av block is associated with a significantly increased risk. V a atrioventricular biv biventricular ccs clinical composite score chf congestive heart failure. The approach of biventricular pacing compared with rv pacing in patients with av block and some degree of lv dysfunction lvef. In this trial, patients with atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction were randomly assigned to receive biventricular or right ventricular pacing. Dualchamber ddd pacing with a short atrioventricular delay, a widely available alternative, initially raised interest for the treatment of lvot obstruction. Upgrading from right ventricular pacing to biventricular. The improvement in systolic function occurred immediately with the first paced beat 45 and was similar but quantitatively smaller in biventricular pacing than in monoventricular lv pacing. Conclusions for patients with atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction, biventricular pacing not only reduces the risk of mortalitymorbidity, but also leads to better clinical outcomes, including improved qol and heart failure status, compared with rv pacing. Conventional versus biventricular pacing in heart failure and. Av block expected to require a high percentage of ventricular pacing that cannot be managed with algorithms to minimize. Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block block hf trial investigators.
Biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with. Biventricular pacing is a wellestablished therapy for hf patients with lv ejection fraction lvef rv pacing to biventricular pacing in those who develop lv systolic dysfunction. Biventricular pacing in prolonged atrioventricular interval. Pdf block block hf trial investigators biventricular pacing for. Block block hf trial investigators biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction article pdf available in new england journal of medicine 36817. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and. Biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator an. The biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block block hf trial examined the role of crt in heart failure patients with atrioventricular block and demonstrated significantly better outcomes with crt compared to right ventricular pacing. Devices combining biventricular pacing and icd capabilities have been evaluated in patients with systolic heart failure and low ejection fractions, who often have clinical indications for both devices. St john sutton m1, plappert t2, adamson pb2, li p2, christman sa2, chung es2, curtis ab2.
Clinical data suggest that biventricular pacing is able to preserve the myocardial performance more effectively than the right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and mild systolic dysfunction. The block hf trial demonstrated better outcomes with crt pacing. Among patients with chronic atrial fibrillation af, cardiac resynchronization therapy crt may be considered in three overlapping clinical settings. For patients who require ventricular pacing but have no left ventricular dysfunction, results of a small rct have suggested that biventricular pacing is associated with improvement in cardiac function, but the trial was small and under. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without. Should all patients with heart block receive biventricular. Hisbundle pacing in a patient with dextrocardia, severe. The authors concluded that for patients with atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction, biventricular pacing not only reduces the risk of mortalitymorbidity, but also leads to better clinical outcomes, including improved qol and heart failure status, compared to rv pacing. Right ventricular pacing restores an adequate heart rate in patients. Pdf block block hf trial investigators biventricular. Effects of cardiac resynchronization on disease progression in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverterdefibrillator, and. However, rv pacing has been associated with an increase in heart failure hf hospitalization and atrial fibrillation af 1 and a composite of hf admissions plus mortality.
Use of biventricular pacing in atrioventricular heart block muhc. Background sustained right ventricular rv apical pacing may lead to deterioration in ventricular function and an increased risk of heart failure, especially in patients with preexisting systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular reverse remodeling with biventricular. Biventricular pacing is superior to right ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with preserved systolic function. Background biventricular pacing in heart failure hf improves survival, relieves symptoms, and. Biventricularleft ventricular pacing in hypertrophic. In patients with highgrade atrioventricular block avb, a standard dualchamber pacemaker can restore av synchrony and ensure an adequate ventricular pacing rate. This article of the month is based on curtis ab, worley s. Parrillo, in critical care medicine third edition, 2008. Her dual chamber 22 medtronic pacemaker had been placed four years ago and was programmed to dddr 90 23 with an upper sensor rate of 125 bpm. Auricchio a, stellbrink c, block m, sack s, vogt j, bakker p. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacinginduced.
608 1235 865 115 1248 1498 1396 15 432 1359 772 1173 1090 615 1151 356 905 886 382 1119 369 598 1020 1343 658 1335 502 130 402 1329 1247